Differences between version 9 and previous revision of WellThoughtOutReasonsToRunWindows.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 9 | Last edited on Saturday, May 12, 2007 8:07:18 pm | by LawrenceDoliveiro | Revert |
| Older page: | version 8 | Last edited on Saturday, September 27, 2003 10:32:53 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@
# Games they want to play often only run on [Windows]; [FirstPersonShooter]s usually being the exception.
# Even though [Windows] comes at a cost, many people already have it. Changing to [Linux] can cost far more than upgrading, at least in terms of time investment.
# They need to run an application written for [Windows] that is not portable; commonly specialist (often [Proprietary]) applications. F.ex, businesses have often been using some accounting package written in [VisualBasic] or [VisualC++] for years; obviously, Unix versions of these applications do not exist and with the business being unwilling/unable to migrate, they are "locked in" to [Windows].
# Though this is slowly changing, hardware manufactures rarely provide [Linux] drivers for their latest products (much less ones for less common [Free] systems such as one of the [BSD] flavours). People who want/need/would like to use these have no choice but [Windows] until someone writes a driver for their hardware and OperatingSystem. (Which may or may not ever happen..)
+# You don't need to run Linux to get access to OpenSource software--see Ubuntu's [ListOfOpenSourcePrograms|https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ListOfOpenSourcePrograms]
See also IssuesWithWindows and WellThoughtOutReasonsToRunLinux
AddToMe
-----
CategoryPolitics
