Penguin
Blame: SelectingADistribution
EditPageHistoryDiffInfoLikePages
Annotated edit history of SelectingADistribution version 45, including all changes. View license author blame.
Rev Author # Line
35 CraigBox 1 ''Originally stolen from http://jotunheim.net/thunder/linux.html but heavily edited.''
2
3 !!! Choices
4
5 Many ReligiousWar~s revolve around choice of LinuxDistribution. You should make your choice depending on goals and taste. The main issue is how much control you want to have over your system vs how much effort you want to put into tweaking things to get them to run. There are specialist distros for particular purposes, such as for old hardware or for a dedicated firewall.
37 PeterHewett 6
38 PeterHewett 7 You can read through the options below, or get the [distribution chooser | http://www.zegeniestudios.net/ldc/index.php] to recommend a distro for you.
35 CraigBox 8
9 Most people will fall into one of these categories:
10
11 !! Never seen Linux before
12
44 IanMcDonald 13 __No-obligation, try before you buy__. You can try out Linux without actually installing it on your PC, by booting up with one of the many [LiveCD] distributions available. KnoppixLinux was the pioneer, but there are now many other choices, including Kanotix and ones like Damn Small Linux and Puppy Linux which are small enough to fit on a business-card-sized CD. The [Ubuntu] CD also runs as a LiveCD version.
40 LawrenceDoliveiro 14
15 Try a few things from the menu and get familiar with it, see that Linux isn't just a command prompt any more, it's a stable, professional operating system. But you get better performance running software off a hard drive than from a CD. Although most of the abovementioned Live CD distros can be installed to your hard disk, you'll probably be better off moving to one of the mainstream distros.
35 CraigBox 16
17 !! Desktop user
18
45 PeterHewett 19 These distributions are at the forefront of combining useful, full featured [Unix] power with an excellent desktop experience. You can use the desktop without any [Linux] knowledge (these distros have configuration tools for almost everything), or you can do everything from [Shell]. They are all very well supported and all use a packaging system (such as [RPM] or [apt | APT]) to make software installation easier. These distros provide both [KDE] and [GNOME] as well as some other window managers.
35 CraigBox 20 Due to legal uncertainties in some countries, these distros don't include some utilities, such as to read encoded DVDs and to make mp3 files. These utilities are available from community sites.
21
22 [Ubuntu]::
45 PeterHewett 23 If you are at all familiar with [Debian], start here. Ubuntu is a Debian derivative founded by a rich philanthropist, which releases stable releases every 6 months designed to be an up to date desktop system. Default desktop is [GNOME], and you should download sister distro [Kubuntu] if you want to try [KDE]. Package management with [apt | APT].
35 CraigBox 24 [Mandriva]::
25 Until recently called [Mandrake], a good for beginners and serious users, focuses on the latest applications and features. Default desktop is [KDE]. Package management with [urpmi] (a development of [RPM]).
26 FedoraCore::
27 If you are at all familiar with [RedHatLinux], start here. Fedora used to be RedHatLinux and was spun off when RedHat moved to focus more on enterprise customers. Default desktop is [GNOME] with [RPM] package manager.
39 AristotlePagaltzis 28 [SUSE]::
35 CraigBox 29 SUSE (as it's currently capitilised) is a very european distro, popular in Europe but used worldwide. Recently (2003ish) Novell purchased SuSE and is marketing and supporting it as a business desktop/server system. Default desktop is [KDE] and package management is YaST (Yet Another Setup Tool).
30 [Xandros | http://www.xandros.org]:
31 Previously Corel Linux. A Debian based distribution. Commercial, but there's an [open circulation | http://www.xandros.org/products/home/desktopoc/dsk_oc_intro.html] edition that's crippled. [KDE] only, no [GNOME].
32
43 CraigBox 33 Which one should you pick? If you don't know where to start, get the one that is used by your friends or at your local LUG. Best approach is to try a few and choose for yourself what you prefer. As of May 2006, we really think you should look at Ubuntu. It is that good. All the above distros are great, and each has enthusiastic followers. Also see the list of [Linux Distributions | LinuxDistribution].
35 CraigBox 34
35
36 !! Appliance style user
37
36 PeterHewett 38 You're going to install it and walk away. The user (maybe you, maybe your folks or grandparents) knows nothing about computers and will not be changing any system settings and doing nothing more than surfing the 'net, sending email, and maybe light office tasks (word processing, etc).
35 CraigBox 39
39 AristotlePagaltzis 40 One approach is to use one of the main distros (like [Ubuntu], [Mandriva], FedoraCore, [SUSE], etc). This might be the way to go if you are already familiar with one of these distros.
36 PeterHewett 41
42 Or you could look at a distro designed for this exact task. The following LinuxDistribution~s exist only to pretend they are MicrosoftWindows. Please note that __almost no-one in [WLUG] runs any of these distributions__. Choice is a double edged sword, but if you feel the user's needs may be better met, these are all still [Linux] too.
35 CraigBox 43
44 [Lycoris Desktop/LX | http://www.lycoris.org]:
45 Previously known as Redmond Linux (to emphasize it's Windows-clone-ness), this has grown into a reasonable desktop distribution. It has a unbelieavably smooth install and sets itself up looking almost exactly like [Windows], so users coming from it should have __no__ problem whatsoever. Like many other distros, it has an auto-update feature that will upgrade the software for you without any major issues. However, as it is mainly for offices and new users, Lycoris locks the system down very tight. Root is hidden (and in fact never mentioned -- you set up an "administrative password" for system maintenance) and some files are in unusual places. For a hard-core customizer, this distro would be incredibly frustrating... about as frustrating to the customizer as it is helpful and friendly to newbies. It's freely downloadable (mind the difference between lycoris.com and .org.)
46 [Linspire]:
40 LawrenceDoliveiro 47 A 'commercial [Linux]' by the guy that tried to make money off MP3's. Originally called Lindows OS, it was renamed after pressure from MicrosoftCorporation, trying to pretend they own the word [Windows]. Designed to be a drop in [Windows] replacement and they're doing a lot of work on desktop apps ([Nvu] and [Wine]). Its USP (Unique Selling Point) is "Click'n'Run", which lets users choose from available packages and have them automatically installed on demand--for paying customers only.
35 CraigBox 48 [Elx Linux | http://www.elxlinux.com/]:
49 Everyone's Linux. A distro from India that looks so much like Windows it's scary.
50 [Ark Linux | http://www.arklinux.org/]:
51 Created by the [KDE] guy who didn't leave RedHat when [Mandrake] started, Ark Linux is a desktop distribution based on [KDE].
52
53 But remember that no matter what you do, LinuxIsNotWindows.
54
55
56 !! SysAdmin, technical tweaker
57
58 If you are a SysAdmin, you probably already have a favourite distro or 2, likely to be one of these.
59
60 [Debian]::
61 The most obvious community-driven Linux. This is a blessing and a curse; the stable versions are rock solid but can become outdated quickly. However, [Debian] has almost everything available for Linux available with one command (apt-get). Don't be put off the by name of the 'Unstable' branch though, that means that the packages are constantly changing, and you can update to the latest versions of all your installed software very easily (see FlavoursOfDebian). [Debian]'s PackageManagement is binary based.
62
63 [Gentoo]::
64 For those who want total control of their system. There are (almost) no binary [Package]s, ''everything'' is compiled from SourceCode. There is currently no installation program, either. You have to set the system up yourself. You don't have to be an überhacker or technical genius, but you the time and will to read the (very detailed and good) documentation, and the energy to follow through.
41 LawrenceDoliveiro 65
66 Build Your Own:
42 LawrenceDoliveiro 67 Even Gentoo not customziable enough for you? Or you just want to learn how it's done? Why not roll your own Linux distro with [LinuxFromScratch]!
35 CraigBox 68
69 !! Enterprise in need of a server
70
71 __You need support with accountability.__ :
72 If you don't have Linux expertise inhouse, find a Linux service provider who is local and competent. They can help you choose a distro.
39 AristotlePagaltzis 73 Globally supported, commercial Linux distributions include [Mandriva | http://www.mandriva.com/business], RedHatEnterpriseLinux and [Novell], [SUSE] products.
35 CraigBox 74
75 __You don't need much third party support.__ :
76 Look first at [CentOs | http://www.centos.org], the best of the RedHatRebuilds. Then consider [Debian] stable. Otherwise, evaluate if your favourite distribution would make for a good server platform. Factor in how quick updates come out, and how long the support for each version is.
77
78 !!! Conclusion
79
80 Linux is about freedom of choice. There are many distros available. Find out about them and take your choice.
81 Those are just a smattering of the available LinuxDistribution~s. If you want more variety, try [Desktop Linux | http://www.desktoplinux.com/index.html] and [Distro Watch | http://www.distrowatch.com/], a site that keeps up with hundreds of LinuxDistribution~s. However, it's advisable to keep to the [major distributions | http://www.distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major] unless you have a specific reason not to. Since a distribution is only a packaging of the greater [GNU]/[Linux] OperatingSystem, everything that can be done on one distribution can be done on any other; the only difference is how much effort is required.
82
83 Once you've made a choice, you may want advice on GettingLinux.
84
85 -----
86 CategoryBeginners