Differences between version 10 and predecessor to the previous major change of BitKeeper.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 10 | Last edited on Thursday, September 1, 2005 10:09:02 am | by IanMcDonald | Revert |
| Older page: | version 7 | Last edited on Tuesday, December 28, 2004 1:26:40 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-[BitKeeper | http://www.bitkeeper.com/] is the VersionControlSystem used for the LinuxKernel development
since sometime around 2.4.13. Its major distinguishing characteristic is that it keeps distributed repositories, unlike the [CVS] model where everyone commits to a central repository located on a single host.
+[BitKeeper | http://www.bitkeeper.com/] is the VersionControlSystem that was
used for KernelDevelopment
since sometime around 2.4.13 until 2.6.12-rc2 when it was replaced by [Git] due to a fallout between the owner of BitKeeper and [OSDL]
. Its major distinguishing characteristic is that it keeps distributed repositories, unlike the [CVS] model where everyone commits to a central repository located on a single host.
It is not FreeSoftware, and does some strange things like making all your changes/log files public unless you buy a commercial licence. (The idea is that OpenSource projects can use it without charge, but people who want to keep changes proprietary need to pay up.) It seems to also require you to accept any changes to the licence whenever ~BitMover choose to make them, and to stay upgraded. Another contentious issue is that they changed their licence so that people working on a competing product, eg SubVersion, cannot use it. There has been a lot of anger over this move, probably rightly.
+
+BitKeeper is no longer available for OpenSource development so above is historical reference to problems that occurred.
