Penguin
Annotated edit history of BitKeeper version 14, including all changes. View license author blame.
Rev Author # Line
10 IanMcDonald 1 [BitKeeper | http://www.bitkeeper.com/] is the VersionControlSystem that was used for KernelDevelopment since sometime around 2.4.13 until 2.6.12-rc2 when it was replaced by [Git] due to a fallout between the owner of BitKeeper and [OSDL]. Its major distinguishing characteristic is that it keeps distributed repositories, unlike the [CVS] model where everyone commits to a central repository located on a single host.
4 BrianFitzpatrick 2
7 AristotlePagaltzis 3 It is not FreeSoftware, and does some strange things like making all your changes/log files public unless you buy a commercial licence. (The idea is that OpenSource projects can use it without charge, but people who want to keep changes proprietary need to pay up.) It seems to also require you to accept any changes to the licence whenever ~BitMover choose to make them, and to stay upgraded. Another contentious issue is that they changed their licence so that people working on a competing product, eg SubVersion, cannot use it. There has been a lot of anger over this move, probably rightly.
8 IanMcDonald 4
5 BitKeeper is no longer available for OpenSource development so above is historical reference to problems that occurred.
11 LawrenceDoliveiro 6
7 Background:
8 * [Summary of the falling out|http://lwn.net/Articles/130746/]
9 * [Report from Infoworld|http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/linus-torvalds-bitkeeper-blunder-905]
10 * [Torvalds' attack on Tridgell|http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/14/torvalds_attacks_tridgell/], and [Bruce Perens' response|http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/15/perens_on_torvalds/]
11 * [Andrew Tridgell's side|http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Tridgell-speaks-out-in-BitKeeper-war/0,130061733,139189087,00.htm], and how he [reverse-engineered BitKeeper|http://lwn.net/Articles/132938/].
12 LawrenceDoliveiro 12
13 ----
14 LawrenceDoliveiro 14 CategoryVersionControl