Differences between current version and predecessor to the previous major change of X509.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 8 | Last edited on Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:40:06 pm | by JuanGarcia | |
Older page: | version 6 | Last edited on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:59:59 pm | by StuartYeates | Revert |
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
X509 is a standard for defining a DigitalCertificate. It is the signing system used for [SSL]. The [X509] PublicKey security model is almost completely incompatible with the [OpenPGP] PublicKey security model, but they serve very different purposes. [X509] is heirarchical and commerce-oriented, whereas [PGP]/[GPG] is massively distributed, very fault tolerant and works using a WebOfTrust.
-Some useful documentation on X509 certificates: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk
/1.2/docs/guide/security/cert3.html.
+Some useful documentation on X509 certificates: http://java.sun.com/j2se
/1.4
.2/docs/guide/security/cert3.html
Some information about how to implement [X509]: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/x509guide.txt This is also just an interesting read to find out why X509 is such a bizarre standard
Things that use X509 certificates:
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
!!Why you won't find much [X509] information on the [InterNet]
The [X509] standard was developed by the [ITU-T] which changes money for version of the standard, rather than making them freely avaliable over the InterNet. This is not a problem if you work for a big telecommunications company which has the resources to get you a copy of the standard, but can be a significant barrier to entry for smaller players and OpenSource developers. This may be a reason for the lack of [X509] support in the open source world, expecially compared to things like [OpenPGP] and other freely avaliable standards.
+__Breaking news!__ the ITU is allowing you to download any 3 specifications per year for free. Which is great since things like [X509] rely on other standards, but by 2033 you may have enough information! :)
----
CategoryStandards