Differences between version 8 and previous revision of Suse.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 8 | Last edited on Wednesday, September 15, 2004 3:33:12 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
| Older page: | version 7 | Last edited on Wednesday, September 1, 2004 9:22:51 pm | by CraigBox | Revert |
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
It is not a bad choice as an introductory system, but most adept users seem to move on to other distributions once they're a bit more familiar with Linux. If you want a beginner friendly European distro that might last you longer, [Mandrake] is possibly a better choice. It is also one you're likely to find help with among [WLUG]gers -- [Suse] never had much of a following in NewZealand.
[Suse] is best suited for businesses rather than end users. Where flexibility and control over any one machine matters less than easy roll-out and maintenance of mass installations, it is an excellent choice. [Suse] offer a popular Enterprise Linux flavour of their distribution, which is often the only option other than RedHatEnterpriseLinux that third-party software vendors will support. In these situations it is a reasonable choice.
-[
Read a review of SUSE Personal Edition 9.1|SuseReview].
+Read a [
review of SUSE Personal Edition 9.1 | SuseReview].
-----
CategoryDistribution
