Differences between version 6 and previous revision of Suse.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 6 | Last edited on Saturday, August 14, 2004 7:53:14 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
Older page: | version 5 | Last edited on Saturday, August 14, 2004 7:50:26 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
Most seasoned users find [Suse] pretty awful as far as distributions go. Its configuration tools interfere with manual tweaking a lot of the time, and while you can ignore them and remove all the automatisms, that certainly means no less work than setting yourself up on a less "puffy" distro. The default install doesn't include things like a [Compiler], make(1), locate(1) and others that really should be available on every "real" system, though you can easily add these missing tools with a few clicks once you know about them.
It is not a bad choice as an introductory system, but most adept users seem to move on to other distributions once they're a bit more familiar with Linux. If you want a beginner friendly European distro that might last you longer, [Mandrake] is possibly a better choice. It is also one you're likely to find help with among [WLUG]gers -- [Suse] never had much of a following in NewZealand.
-[Suse] is best suited for businesses rather than end users. Where flexibility and control over any one machine matters less than easy roll-out and maintenance of mass installations, it is an excellent choice. [Suse] offer a popular Enterprise Linux flavour of their distribution, which is often the only supported
option next to RedHat Enterprise Linux
. In these situations it is a reasonable choice.
+[Suse] is best suited for businesses rather than end users. Where flexibility and control over any one machine matters less than easy roll-out and maintenance of mass installations, it is an excellent choice. [Suse] offer a popular Enterprise Linux flavour of their distribution, which is often the only option other than RedHatEnterpriseLinux that third-party software vendors will support
. In these situations it is a reasonable choice.
-----
CategoryDistribution