Differences between current version and revision by previous author of PostRelationalDataBase.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 2 | Last edited on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 5:43:01 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | |
| Older page: | version 1 | Last edited on Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:50:14 pm | by StuartYeates | Revert |
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
[RelationalDataBase]s proved very powerful but somewhat hard to use for mortals, leading to their extension. Typical extensions include:
# Procedural extensions to [SQL]. These lead to the current plathora of SQL variants--everyone extended SQL differently.
# Extensions to the relation structure to allow for variable sized fields, particularly for string data. These have much less impact than the procedural extensions to [SQL] and are largely implemented by making fields pointers to the data rather than the data itself.
+Most real-world databases are [PostRelationalDataBase]s: [Oracle], [MySQL], [PostgreSQL], [Microsoft] [SQL] Server, Informix, Borland Interbase, [FireBird] and [IBM] [DB2].
-Most real-world databases are [PostRelationalDataBase]s
:
-[Oracle], [MySQL], [PostgreSQL], [Microsoft] [SQL] Server, Informix, Borland Interbase, [FireBird] and [IBM] [DB2]
.
+__See also
:__ http://howfuckedismydatabase
.com/
