Differences between version 23 and predecessor to the previous major change of ParliamentaryQuestions.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 23 | Last edited on Saturday, November 27, 2004 4:45:28 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
Older page: | version 19 | Last edited on Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:23:47 am | by PerryLorier | Revert |
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
-On Thursday the 18th of November, the [WLUG] was privileged to have RodneyHide, the leader of NewZealand's [ACT] political party, address us.
+On Thursday the 18th of November, the [WLUG] was privileged to have RodneyHide, the leader of NewZealand's [ACT] political party, address us. See the [MeetingTopics.2004-11-18] page for an outline of this enjoyable meeting
.
-See
the [MeetingTopics.2004-11-18] page for
an outline
of this enjoyable meeting
.
+Rodney is interested in open source software and told us about
the powers of
an opposition MP to ask questions
of government departments regarding their use. He has offered to submit ParliamentaryQuestions on our behalf, which are written questions that must be answered within five working days. Rodney will endeavor to assist us in formulating these in the most effective manner
.
-The [
WLUG] should focus on raising Parliamentary questions,
and Rodney will endeavor
to assist us
in formulating these
in the most effective manner
.
+Please note that the
WLUG are not affilliated with any political party (
and don't even have a leaning). This is not a "Government bashing" or "Microsoft bashing" exercise; this is a method
to further the goals of the WlugCharter
in advocating [Linux] and OpenSource software.
+
+Also, anyone can edit this page - if you're going to discuss this project, doing so on this page ensures that everything you say can be taken on board and included
in the process
.
Notes on the process:
-Questions should be as specific as possible, especially with respect to dates. This makes evading the questions difficult.%%%
-The original answer documents can be requested if there is a suspicion that the provided answer may be male bovine fecal matter.
+*
Questions should be as specific as possible, especially with respect to dates. This makes evading the questions difficult.
+*
The original answer documents can be requested if there is a suspicion that the provided answer may be male bovine fecal matter.
With that in mind:
-----