Differences between version 13 and previous revision of IntellectualProperty.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 13 | Last edited on Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:26:55 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
| Older page: | version 12 | Last edited on Friday, February 4, 2005 2:05:00 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-IntellectualProperty is an oxymoron: the legal concept asserting that ideas can be owned. Be aware that there is no actual IntellectualProperty law; the concept is manifested in various distinct ways such as CopyRight and [Patent] laws. The term IntellectualProperty is often abused by MarkeTroid~s to conflate issues spanning multiple kinds of IntellectualProperty law in order to muddle over all-important details. [SCO]'s [Linux] [FUD] was a particularly egregious example of the practice. The [FSF] [dislike the term for this reason | http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml] and list it as [one of the words to avoid | http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty] for this reason and suggest focussing
on the individual aspects of law such as CopyRight and [Patent]s instead
.
+IntellectualProperty is an oxymoron: the legal concept asserting that ideas can be owned. Be aware that there is no actual IntellectualProperty law; the concept is manifested in various distinct ways such as CopyRight and [Patent] laws. The term IntellectualProperty is often abused by MarkeTroid~s to conflate issues spanning multiple kinds of IntellectualProperty law in order to muddle over all-important details. [SCO]'s [Linux] [FUD] was a particularly egregious example of the practice. The [FSF] [dislike the term for this reason | http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml] and list it as [one of the words to avoid | http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty], suggesting instead to focus
on the individual aspects of law such as CopyRight and [Patent]s.
The [World Intellectual Property Organisation | http://www.wipo.org] defined the term as the range of property rights accorded for the protection of creations of the mind, including
* Literary, artistic and scientific works;
