Penguin
Diff: FunctionalLanguages
EditPageHistoryDiffInfoLikePages

Differences between version 5 and predecessor to the previous major change of FunctionalLanguages.

Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History

Newer page: version 5 Last edited on Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:12:31 pm by StuartYeates Revert
Older page: version 1 Last edited on Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:28:15 pm by SamJansen Revert
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 A type of ProgrammingLanguage. FunctionalLanguages make the distinction that everything (or near everything) is a function. They often lend to recursion more than iteration. Some examples of FunctionalLanguages are: 
  
 * [Haskell] 
+* [Erlang]  
 * [ML] 
 * [LISP] 
+* [XSLT]  
  
 Programmers generally choose to code in ImperativeLanguages as they find these easier to make practical applications. It has been theorised that this is because most people learn languages such as C++, BASIC, Java, etc. first and only learn FunctionalLanguages later, never really learning to think like a functional programmer. Perhaps if more programmers were taught to think in a functional style from their infancy we would see more applications written in FunctionalLanguages. Then again, maybe it is just easier to write a useful program in [Python].