Differences between version 9 and predecessor to the previous major change of Fork.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 9 | Last edited on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:59:56 pm | by IanMcDonald | Revert |
| Older page: | version 8 | Last edited on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:41:17 pm | by LawrenceDoliveiro | Revert |
@@ -7,8 +7,9 @@
* [Mandrake] and RedHat (I think Mandrake was originally RedHat with [KDE]?)
* [Emacs] and XEmacs, both branches of which continue to thrive to this day.
* [XFree86] and [XOrg], where an unpopular change to the licensing terms of the former caused a wholesale defection of developers, distributors and users to the latter.
* More recently, the forking of [cdrkit] off from <tt>cdrtools</tt>, because of a licence change to the latter. It remains to be seen how this one will play out.
+* [RPM] and RPM5 - see http://www.linux.com/articles/114339
Some interesting analyses of the pros and cons of forking are:
* Rick Moen's [Fear of Forking|http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/forking.html], subtitled "Why Linux Won't Work, And why being able to fork is still A Good Thing."
@@ -18,7 +19,7 @@
See also [OpenSource]
!!!2. A system call for creating a new process
-see fork(2)
+see [
fork(2)]
the fork system call is fun, it returns twice... once in each different process. it returns 0 to the child, and the pid of the child to the parent. Very funky :)
