Differences between version 7 and previous revision of Fork.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 7 | Last edited on Monday, June 25, 2007 11:42:53 am | by LawrenceDoliveiro | Revert |
| Older page: | version 6 | Last edited on Monday, June 25, 2007 11:40:35 am | by LawrenceDoliveiro | Revert |
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
Well-known examples include
* [GCC] and egcs (egcs eventually became the new "official" gcc)
* [Mandrake] and RedHat (I think Mandrake was originally RedHat with [KDE]?)
* [Emacs] and XEmacs, both branches of which continue to thrive to this day.
-* XFree86 and XOrg, where an unpopular change to the licensing terms of the former caused a wholesale defection of developers, distributors and users to the latter.
+* [
XFree86]
and [
XOrg]
, where an unpopular change to the licensing terms of the former caused a wholesale defection of developers, distributors and users to the latter.
Some interesting analyses of the pros and cons of forking are:
* Rick Moen's [Fear of Forking|http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/forking.html], subtitled "Why Linux Won't Work, And why being able to fork is still A Good Thing."
