Differences between version 5 and previous revision of FUD.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 5 | Last edited on Sunday, July 4, 2004 2:23:18 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
Older page: | version 4 | Last edited on Sunday, July 4, 2004 12:57:18 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
See also: LinuxFudDispelled
!! Historical examples
-Digital Research launched their [DR-DOS], which was better and cheaper than [MS-DOS] 5 and received favourable reviews all around. [Microsoft] then released
a beta of Windows 3.1 that produced a
warning message when run under [DR-DOS], and
announced [MS-DOS] 6, which
would do [DR-DOS] did
and more. In reality, [MS-DOS] 6 was vapourware at the time, and
it is questionable whether the materialized product
was better than [DR-DOS]. However
, everyone was saying that
[DR-DOS
] is great but you may have problems running Windows on it, and together with
a dealer package designed to make
it cheaper
to bundle [MS-DOS] and Windows
, [DR-DOS] was
dead in the water. This may have been
the making of the [Microsoft] monopoly.
+Digital Research launched their [DR-DOS], which was better and cheaper than [MS-DOS] 5 and received favourable reviews all around. [Microsoft] reacted by putting out
a beta of Windows 3.1 that produced an inconsequential
warning message when run under [DR-DOS]. They also
announced that
[MS-DOS] 6 would do all that
[DR-DOS] could
and more. In reality, [MS-DOS] 6 was vapourware at the time. The rumour spread that you'd have problems running Windows on [DR-DOS]
, even though
it wasn't true at all. It
is questionable whether the [MS-DOS] 6 that eventually
materialized was better than [DR-DOS], but
[Microsoft
] designed
a dealer package that made
it more expensive not
to bundle Windows with
[MS-DOS], and left
[DR-DOS] dead in the water. This is believed to be
the making of the [Microsoft] monopoly.
-AMSTRAD was a UK consumer electronics manufacturer who
product design rationalization allowed them to sell decent electronics at rock-bottom prices. When they decided to launch a range of home consumer [PC]s, they found a 35W [PSU] to be sufficient even with a HardDisk and tape streamer attached (low end [PC]s of the time usually came with twin floppy drives), so they decided to upgrade
the monitor [PSU] and supply the entire computer from it
. Since there was no [PSU] in the computer case and its electronics only dissipated about 20W, AMSTRAD PCs required no fan in the case and so were quieter. They were a great success -- so great that they began to find their way into offices where equivalent 'traditional' models typically cost 50-100% more and made a lot of noise. So the
[FUD] spread: "The AMSTRAD has no cooling fan! With a hard disk it'll melt! Your crashes are because your AMSTRAD is overheating!" That was
easily refuted since
AMSTRADs worked well,
and the case
would be
cool even
after using them all
day. New
customers were still getting scared away
because AMSTRAD PCs had no fan when all others did. So in the end AMSTRAD fitted useless fans
in the back of the case where the PSU normally goes,
and everybody was happy. People in the know cut the wires to the fan and never had any problems, but the majority just accepted the constant fan noise as a necessity.
+AMSTRAD was a UK consumer electronics manufacturer whose
product design rationalization allowed them to sell decent electronics at rock-bottom prices. When they decided to launch a range of home consumer [PC]s, they found a 35W [PSU] to be sufficient even with a HardDisk and tape streamer attached (low end [PC]s of the time usually came with twin floppy drives), so they decided to power
the entire system from the upgraded
monitor [PSU]. Since there was no [PSU] in the computer case and its electronics only dissipated about 20W, AMSTRAD PCs required no fan in the case and so were quieter. They were a great success -- so great that they began to find their way into offices where equivalent 'traditional' models typically cost 50-100% more and made a lot of noise. The
[FUD] spread: "The AMSTRAD has no cooling fan! With a hard disk it'll melt! Your crashes are because your AMSTRAD is overheating!" These rumours were
easily refuted, as
AMSTRADs worked well and would remain
cool after a
day's worth of use, but they scared new
customers because AMSTRAD PCs had no fan when all others did. So in the end AMSTRAD fitted a
useless fan
in the back of the case and everybody was happy. People in the know cut the wires to the fan and never had any problems, but the majority just accepted the constant fan noise as a necessity.