Differences between version 3 and revision by previous author of EyeCandy.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 3 | Last edited on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:29:46 pm | by JohnMcPherson | Revert |
| Older page: | version 2 | Last edited on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:39:52 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
Stuff whose sole purpose is to be pleasing to the eye. More than just "good looking"; adding EyeCandy requires extra effort that does not add to functionality.
-F.ex
, even a basic WindowManager can look nice, but that doesn't qualify as EyeCandy. Things that to are, f.ex
, titlebar transparency support or extra animations.
+For example
, even a basic WindowManager can look nice, but that doesn't qualify as EyeCandy. Things that to are, for example
, titlebar transparency support or extra animations.
+
+Sort of like the blonde girls you see on TV in the pits at motorsport events?
