Penguin
Diff: AsymmetricMultiProcessing
EditPageHistoryDiffInfoLikePages

Differences between current version and revision by previous author of AsymmetricMultiProcessing.

Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History

Newer page: version 3 Last edited on Tuesday, November 2, 2004 4:50:17 am by AristotlePagaltzis
Older page: version 1 Last edited on Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:45:05 pm by StuartYeates Revert
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
+A system where a frontend [CPU] deals with all [I/O] and system tasks and the others do the number crunching. Contrast [NUMA] and SymmetricMultiProcessing.  
  
-A system with several processors run having different access to memory and to the IO subsytem(s). Contrast NUMA and SymmetricMultiProcessing.  
+----  
  
-Most modern computers use AsymmetricMultiProcessing, with processors to handle graphics, network or disk access logic. These processors may have special operations to achieve these tasks or may be generic processors tasked with the function. This seperation of function removes constriants from the [CPU] (or [CPU]s) to run the application logic with fewer scheduling and "house keeping" operations to run. 
+Most modern computers use AsymmetricMultiProcessing, with processors to handle graphics, network or disk access logic. These processors may have special operations to achieve these tasks or may be generic processors tasked with the function. This seperation of function removes constriants from the [CPU] (or [CPU]s) to run the application logic with fewer scheduling and "house keeping" operations to run. --StuartYeates  
+  
+This does not fall under AsymmetricMultiProcessing. These other chips are coprocessors at best, or as little as [DSP]s. If you count this as AMP, then even the board chipset would count as [CPU]s, which is obviously absurd. --AristotlePagaltzis