Differences between version 9 and revision by previous author of Yoper.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 9 | Last edited on Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:26:00 am | by JesseWalker | Revert |
| Older page: | version 8 | Last edited on Sunday, July 11, 2004 2:37:30 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -2,11 +2,14 @@
----
;: It doesn't fare very well in OSNews' [Quest for the Perfect Linux System | http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3229&page=6] comparative review. -- Anonymous
+
+;: That was for V1, now have a look at their fair-enough review of V2 at http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=7942 and also another review of V2 by a user at http://hungsquirrel.org/blog/?postid=43
+;: Yoper just gets better and better and will only continue to do so. We take onboard what the users tell us. Our next public release will be amazing! :D -- JesseWalker (Bongoots)
;: A couple of things here: This article is reviewing v1.0 of [Yoper]. v1.2 has been out since late last year (Dec or Nov 2003 I think) and this release is worlds better than v1. [Yoper] is no longer a paid for distro. You can download the [ISO]s for free from their web sites (and they have a local nz mirror for all you jetstarters :) ). And despite the support issues (which in my opinion were short-lived) [Yoper] is still the fastest, easiest-to-install LinuxDistribution i've yet to find. -- ThomHooker
;: It's fine that you think good of yoper. What's not fine is yopers self agrandisment. They don't seem to be shamelessly promoting themselves as the best solution for everything-under-the-sun anymore which is a good thing. --Anonymous
----
CategoryDistribution
