Differences between version 12 and previous revision of XML.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 12 | Last edited on Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:16:16 pm | by StuartYeates | Revert |
Older page: | version 11 | Last edited on Monday, October 6, 2003 7:55:55 pm | by StuartYeates | Revert |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-An [Acronym] (yet another [TLA]) for e__X__tensible __M__arkup __L__anguage, a marginally human read-/editable MarkupLanguage which is a simplified decendant of [SGML].
+An [Acronym] (yet another [TLA]) for e__X__tensible __M__arkup __L__anguage, a marginally human read-/editable MarkupLanguage which is a simplified decendant of [SGML]. The [W3C] maintains the [XML] standard
.
[SGML] was an extremely comprehensive standard for which hardly a single fully compliant parser was ever written. Many of its features, even implemented ones, are hardly used. On the other hand, it lacks various useful features. [XML] was designed to address these shortcomings while reducing the language specification to a small set of rules in order to be easily and consistently parsable. It lacks features such as [CONCUR] but adds others such as [NameSpace]s (as good an idea in a MarkupLanguage as they are in a ProgrammingLanguage).
[XML] is specialised using a [DTD] or a [Schema] to describe the structure of data within a [XML] document. Each specialisation is actually a new language for marking up a particular type of data. Thus DocBook is a specialisation for marking up the text of books, [XHTML] is a specialisation for marking up web pages, [MathML] is a specialisation for marking up mathematical equations, tables and formulae and [XSLT] is a specialisation for marking up a programming language (a FunctionalLanguage written in XML).
@@ -43,4 +43,8 @@
** Microsoft's secret weapon against [Sun]'s Open Office
** Sun's secret weapon against [Microsoft]'s Office
** The town bicycle
;: %%% --Rick Jelliffe
+
+
+----
+CategoryStandards