Differences between version 6 and predecessor to the previous major change of X509.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 6 | Last edited on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:59:59 pm | by StuartYeates | Revert |
Older page: | version 5 | Last edited on Thursday, April 1, 2004 2:43:02 am | by StuartYeates | Revert |
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
X509 is a standard for defining a DigitalCertificate. It is the signing system used for [SSL]. The [X509] PublicKey security model is almost completely incompatible with the [OpenPGP] PublicKey security model, but they serve very different purposes. [X509] is heirarchical and commerce-oriented, whereas [PGP]/[GPG] is massively distributed, very fault tolerant and works using a WebOfTrust.
Some useful documentation on X509 certificates: http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/docs/guide/security/cert3.html.
-Some information about how to implement [X509]
-*
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/x509guide.txt
-
This is also just an interesting read to find out why X509 is such a bizarre standard
+Some information about how to implement [X509]:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/x509guide.txt This is also just an interesting read to find out why X509 is such a bizarre standard
Things that use X509 certificates:
* Various code-signing schemes, such as signed Java ARchives, and Microsoft Authenticode (because these things are built upon [SSL]).
-* Various secure E-Mail standards, such as PEM and S/MIME (S/MIME can also use [OpenPGP]).
+* Various secure E-Mail standards, such as [
PEM]
and [
S/MIME]
(S/MIME can also use [OpenPGP]).
* E-Commerce protocols, such as SET.
* MicrosoftWindows
-AddToMe
...
+!!Why you won't find much [X509] information on the [InterNet]
+
+The [X509] standard was developed by the [ITU-T] which changes money for version of the standard, rather than making them freely avaliable over the InterNet
. This is not a problem if you work for a big telecommunications company which has the resources to get you a copy of the standard, but can be a significant barrier to entry for smaller players and OpenSource developers
. This may be a reason for the lack of [X509] support in the open source world, expecially compared to things like [OpenPGP] and other freely avaliable standards
.
----
CategoryStandards