Differences between version 44 and predecessor to the previous major change of WantedWikiFeatures.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 44 | Last edited on Saturday, October 2, 2004 11:35:04 am | by CraigBox | Revert |
| Older page: | version 40 | Last edited on Friday, October 1, 2004 10:54:30 am | by JohnMcPherson | Revert |
@@ -1,19 +1,22 @@
You can't put a : in a line that starts with a ;. And in new markup, you can't put another: in the second line. Reini's links were all eaten when this page changed to new markup. -- CraigBox
------
-Can someone tell me how to make a wiki page for [/dev/random | dev/random ]
? I'd thought
the page would be http://www
.wlug.org.nz/%2Fdev%2Frandom, but the wiki doesn't like that. StuartYeates
+Can explain what you mean
? I've not had any trouble with new markup except
the abominable table syntax
. --AristotlePagaltzis
-;: ''Just like that'' -- ReiniUrban
+; Testing
: Where did this text go? Let me demonstrate - this is an example: What
's wrong with this line? (View the source). Might be fixed in newer versions.
-Turns out that there is a bug in our installed version of phpwiki that strips a leading "/". If/when we upgrade to a newer version this should be fixed
. -- JohnMcPherson
-----
-A mode suitable for including [GPG] keys and other ascii armored texts would be nice. StuartYeates
+For the table, see OldStyleTablePlugin
. -- CraigBox
-New markup and < verbatim > - however remember by nature a Wiki is editable and there is no concept of page ownership
. -- CraigBox
+Yeah you shouldn't use that syntax anymore
. Try this:
-;
: ''Latest PhpWiki releases support all that
.''
-- ReiniUrban
-----
+Testing
:
+ Where did this text go? Let me demonstrate - this is an example: What
's wrong with this line? The answer is nothing.
+
+It looks much nicer in the source too
. --AristotlePagaltzis
+
+Ahh. Nice, but the other stuff still shouldn't be eaten. :)
+
+-
----
Using referrer.log do a nightly/hourly import of all sane looking (ie: not google or wlug.org.nz) /backlinks/ into the backlinks page from the web. This will give an interesting insite into who/where are linking to us and will be an automagic way to add 'content' to pages, in a backwards kinda way.
Be sure to stop google crawling these links, as it'll drop our pagerank?
@@ -23,17 +26,17 @@
If there is a way to make apache do this in real-time, this would also be great, then just have a nightly SQL statement removing a token from each bucket, then removing empty links. --JamesSpooner
Wiki is already a target of referer spam, people who put a 1x1 img or iframe that links to the wiki so that they show up heaps on our referers. No idea why they're doing it, but a lot of our referers are from porn sites, so I'm not keen on encouraging this behaviour. -- PerryLorier
-;:
''Since 1.3.10 we allow size=w x h attributes for images. Should we disallow too small sizes, say below 8x8?'' -- ReiniUrban
+
''Since 1.3.10 we allow size=w x h attributes for images. Should we disallow too small sizes, say below 8x8?'' -- ReiniUrban
This simply means they're performing a denial of service, rather than some form of advertising. To say that it's not an option before exploring the possibilities is a little premature, the page with the links can be flagged no-crawl such that we don't 'link' to porn sites and can be linked off the main backlinks page such that only interested parties will view the links, with suitable disclaimers etc. This _will_ add considerable value to the wiki. -- JamesSpooner
----
Quoting CraigBox on refactoring link lists to Category pages:
-;:
''I agree, with the same reservations (which I don't care about as much any more and won't care about at all if the OrphanedPages script could ignores pages with no backlinks if they have a ~CategorySomething footer... ;)''
+
''I agree, with the same reservations (which I don't care about as much any more and won't care about at all if the OrphanedPages script could ignores pages with no backlinks if they have a ~CategorySomething footer... ;)''
I would suggest a two-fold condition for ignoring apparent orphans: they should contain a ~CategoryFoo link and the ~CategoryFoo page should exist.
--AristotlePagaltzis
@@ -50,15 +53,8 @@
%%% -- StuartYeates
It's not quite the same as what you've asked for, but I got the [greenstone wiki collection|http://www.wlug.org.nz/gsdl/cgi-bin/library?c=wiki&p=about] to record the last author for each page, and they get grouped by author. So you can see which pages someone was the most recent editor for (at time of indexing). -- JohnMcPherson
-----
-
-Some way of automatically sucking in frequently updated HOWTOs and FAQs to ensure for correctness.
-%%% -- StuartYeates
-
-How would we suck them in? How would we merge these changes with local changes?
-%%% -- PerryLorier
----
Maybe you want to use real fortune on php, instead of the simple taglines: http://www.aasted.org/quote/
