Differences between version 5 and revision by previous author of VirtualPrivateServer.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 5 | Last edited on Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:15:21 am | by IanMcDonald | Revert |
| Older page: | version 4 | Last edited on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:38:22 pm | by LinNah | Revert |
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
Various software projects exist that implement this strategy:
* UserModeLinux ([GPL])
* [Linux-VServer | http://www.linux-vserver.org/] ([GPL])
-* [Xen | http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/
] ([GPL])
+* [Xen]
* [Virtuozzo | http://www.sw-soft.com/en/products/virtuozzo/]
* [VMWare]
----
@@ -15,4 +15,6 @@
* [Overview|http://www.xminc.com/mt/archives/000254.html] is a blog entry with a short description and links to Colinux, QEMU, XEN & UML
* [How Xen is Different|http://xen.terrabox.com/index.php/How%20is%20Xen%20different%3F] is a page on Xen's Unofficial Wiki. Probably slightly bias towards Xen. Interesting because it lists pros and cons of xen, UML, virtuosso, vmware and vserver. Bias means it is from a xen fan's POV.
* [Xen Perfomance|http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/performance.html] is again found on Xen's site. Xen's performance is compared with native linux,UML, and VMWare.
* [Why VServer instead of UML or Xen|http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Linux2.6/index.php?page=FSM_Article]: Goes over briefly why you would choose VServer over UML or Xen.
+----
+InNeedOfRefactor
