Differences between current version and previous revision of Suckage.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 3 | Last edited on Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:41:23 pm | by StuartYeates | |
Older page: | version 2 | Last edited on Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:29:49 am | by StuartYeates | Revert |
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
The concept that broad classes of things suck.
-# [Hardware] sucks. The semi-mythical [PDP
] was rumoured to suck only slightly, but everything more recent sucks noticibly. Because suckage of a system is proportional to the sum of the suckage of it's parts to the power of the number of parts, modern systems built of many subsystems and sub-subsystems are very sucky.
+# [Hardware] sucks. The semi-mythical [PDP11
] was rumoured to suck only slightly, but everything more recent sucks noticibly. Because suckage of a system is proportional to the sum of the suckage of it's parts to the power of the number of parts, modern systems built of many subsystems and sub-subsystems are very sucky.
# [ProgrammingLanguage]s suck. MachineLanguage sucks in direct proportion to the underlying hardware. Every layer above the MachineLanguage increases the suckage factorially. For this reason, never point a [CompilerCompiler] running on a [VirtualMachine] (see [JavaCC]) at the moon or risk peturbing it's orbit.
-# [Software] sucks. Partly because it is written in a [ProgrammingLanguage], partly because it is configured and used by Wetware.
+# [Software] sucks. Partly because it is written in a [ProgrammingLanguage], partly because it is configured and used by [
Wetware]
.
# [Wetware] sucks. [Luser]s' suckage is a combination of their innate suckage and the suckage of the hardware and software they use. Of course, their innate suckage leads to a preferance for very suck hardware and software, which doesn't help.
See also news://alt.sysadmin.recovery/ http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sysadmin-recovery/