Differences between current version and predecessor to the previous major change of StandardsCompliant.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 4 | Last edited on Monday, September 6, 2004 9:31:23 pm | by GreigMcGill | |
Older page: | version 1 | Last edited on Sunday, August 10, 2003 1:45:30 pm | by CraigBox | Revert |
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
-Complying with the standards ([RFC]s, [IETF] documents etc) instead of doing things your own way and causing pain to people.)
+Complying with the standards ([RFC]s, [IETF] documents etc) instead of doing things your own way and causing pain to people.
Examples: in the WebBrowser world, InternetExplorer is NOT StandardsCompliant. [Mozilla] is. However, InternetExplorer is big (90% of all the web maybe?) so its intracies and syntax have become just as important to designers who want their pages to look good and read well.
+
+As an old adage goes (roughly), ''the nice thing about standards is that everyone can pick one for themselves''.
+
+See RealWorldWebCompliance for some of our notes on how to make your web pages look good in everything.