Differences between version 19 and predecessor to the previous major change of SoftwarePatent.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 19 | Last edited on Friday, August 14, 2009 1:24:39 pm | by JohnBillings | Revert |
| Older page: | version 18 | Last edited on Sunday, July 31, 2005 11:36:31 am | by MattBrown | Revert |
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
An excellent example of why SoftwarePatent~s are bad is found in the [Thoughts Are Free! | http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/basics/thoughts.html] document under the __Patents on software are just as wrong as expanding the patent system to literature__ heading.
-Another quote from noone other than BillGates, in his [Challenges and Strategy | http://www.bralyn.net/etext/literature/bill.gates/challenges-strategy.txt] memo from 1991:''''
+Another quote from noone other than BillGates, in his (dead link, find alternative)
[Challenges and Strategy | http://www.bralyn.net/etext/literature/bill.gates/challenges-strategy.txt] memo from 1991:''''
If people had understood how patents would be granted when most of today's ideas were invented, and had taken out patents, the industry would be at a complete standstill today.
He goes on:''''
