Differences between version 5 and previous revision of SUSE.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 5 | Last edited on Monday, May 15, 2006 5:05:59 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
| Older page: | version 4 | Last edited on Monday, May 15, 2006 3:47:39 pm | by CraigBox | Revert |
@@ -9,12 +9,11 @@
It is not a bad choice as an introductory system, but most adept users seem to move on to other distributions once they're a bit more familiar with Linux. If you want a beginner friendly LinuxDistribution that might last you longer, [Ubuntu] is possibly a better choice. It is also one you're likely to find help with among [WLUG]gers -- [SUSE] never had much of a following in NewZealand.
[SUSE] is best suited for businesses rather than end users. Where flexibility and control over any one machine matters less than easy roll-out and maintenance of mass installations, it is an excellent choice. [SUSE] offer a popular Enterprise Linux flavour of their distribution, which is often the only option other than RedHatEnterpriseLinux that third-party software vendors will support. In these situations it is a reasonable choice.
-Read a [review of SUSE Personal Edition 9.1 | SuseReview].
+!! See also
------
-!! Things you can do with
[SUSE]
-* Run
OpenLDAP/Samba server, see
http://www.stress-free.co.nz/content/view/126/59/
+*
[A review of
SUSE Personal Edition 9.1 | SuseReview
]
+* [SUSE/
OpenLDAP/Samba server tutorial |
http://www.stress-free.co.nz/content/view/126/59/]
-----
CategoryDistribution
