Differences between version 17 and previous revision of ParliamentaryQuestions.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 17 | Last edited on Monday, November 22, 2004 11:04:04 pm | by DavidHallett | Revert |
| Older page: | version 15 | Last edited on Friday, November 19, 2004 11:34:19 am | by zcat(1) | Revert |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-On Thursday the 18th of November, the [WLUG] was priveleged
to have RodneyHide, the leader of NewZealand's [ACT] political party, address us.
+On Thursday the 18th of November, the [WLUG] was privileged
to have RodneyHide, the leader of NewZealand's [ACT] political party, address us.
See the [MeetingTopics.2004-11-18] page for an outline of this enjoyable meeting.
The [WLUG] should focus on raising Parliamentary questions, and Rodney will endeavor to assist us in formulating these in the most effective manner.
@@ -51,4 +51,7 @@
!!Other things we need to phrase into questions:
* Microsoft in Schools
* ComCom & [ADSL] in New Zealand?
* Māori language translations/interfaces (eg gnome 2.6 and kde have some 'mi' locale support). Educational software that has a US focus rather than NZ? (video/audio accents, history (think 'Oregon Trail', etc)
+
+----
+Something I think needs dicussing is the idea of Government (Tax Payer) funds being used by IT Contractors to develop custom appliations that are licensed under a proprietory license. I think all "new code" developed from Governmental organisations should be licensed under an Open Source license. We as tax payers paid for the software, we should own the software.
