Differences between version 19 and revision by previous author of ParliamentaryQuestions.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 19 | Last edited on Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:23:47 am | by PerryLorier | Revert |
| Older page: | version 18 | Last edited on Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:30:10 pm | by PaulLa | Revert |
@@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
RodneyHide asked us what questions we'd like various government departments asked. This page is where we can discuss questions and talk about rewording them before their submission. Each question is made into a title so that the discussion about that question can happen underneath.
!How much money has ''this department'' spent in the last financial year on commercial proprietary software products?
Does this relate to maintaining/maintenance charges, or to purchase of new products? Suggest modifying to 'How much money has ''this department'' spent in the last financial year purchasing new commercial proprietary software products for which a viable open source alternative exists.'' - PaulL
+
+This has the door open that they can claim out that an open source alternative isn't viable. if you want an answer, you have to make sure that they can't redefine terms on you :) -- PerryLorier
Also suggest specifying particular categories of open source software - lets not get into the argument about products like eAI tools that do not have a good and well accepted open source alternative. So perhaps 'How much money has ''this department'' spent in the last financial year purchasing new proprietary web servers where Apache web server offered a viable alternative.' etc etc. Perhaps also focus on the dollar figures spent on operating systems (we can safely include maintenance here, as we are making the point that if they moved to open source they wouldn't have this cost), and on desktop and productivity software in an environment such as a front-office application, where obscure toolsets aren't typically required - a front-office app usually requires only Office apps, browser, 3270 emulation and e-mail - PaulL
!How many machines within ''this department'' are running Linux or other OpenSource operating systems in production as of ''today''?
@@ -47,8 +49,10 @@
!Why does ''this department'' not have versions of its files available for download in a more open format such as pdf or html?
(Paired with the above question where appropriate)
Given the availability of openoffice, is the format of the document really an open source issue? I would suggest focusing on the high value questions where clear dollar figures can be pointed to - PaulL
+
+Yes it is important. OpenOffice isn't 100% at reading files. Posting doc files on the web is considered bad practice, even by microsoft. Also, there are devices which are unlikely to ever run any office software, eg, a cellphone. Having the document available in html means anyone can read it anywhere on anything. If it's a document that needs to be printed (a form perhaps to be mailed back if an online version of the form isn't feasible for some reason eg, requires signatures) then PDF is obviously the right answer (it always prints as intended where office documents won't print reliably the same between different versions of word). -- PerryLorier
!How much of the last round of ''funding body ([FRST]/[TBG])'' projects gone towards development of Open Source Software as defined by http://www.opensource.org/?
!When awarding contracts for software application development, would ''the department'' consider favouring Open Sourced solutions as being in the best interests of NewZealand citizens? If not, why not?
