Differences between version 7 and previous revision of POSIX_ME_HARDER.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 7 | Last edited on Monday, March 28, 2005 10:16:09 pm | by DominiqueQuatravaux | Revert |
| Older page: | version 6 | Last edited on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:33:02 pm | by JohnMcPherson | Revert |
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
[POSIX_ME_HARDER] is an alias for the [POSIXLY_CORRECT] an environment variable that can be used for some programs, particularly those written by people exasperated by some aspect of the [POSIX] standards.
-;[RMS] quote (he was on the standards committee):To have an excuse to say that we still support the spec, if you define the environment variable, POSIX_ME_HARDER was the original way. Then a slightly prudish board member convinced me to change it to POSIXLY_CORRECT which I now think was a mistake. I should have left it as POSIX_ME_HARDER.
+;[RMS] quote (he was on the standards committee - See the [original quote| http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html?page=2] in an interview with Federico Biancuzzi
):To have an excuse to say that we still support the spec, if you define the environment variable, POSIX_ME_HARDER was the original way. Then a slightly prudish board member convinced me to change it to POSIXLY_CORRECT which I now think was a mistake. I should have left it as POSIX_ME_HARDER.
See [Democracy Triumphs in Disk Units|http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=9108281809.AA03552%40mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu].
(To put this message in context, there had recently been a coup that resulted in the demise of the Soviet Union.)
Despite that page suggesting that df(1) uses [POSIX_ME_HARDER], at least recent versions don't. So it's not a very good alias.
