Penguin

Differences between current version and revision by previous author of OnTrust.

Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History

Newer page: version 4 Last edited on Monday, June 1, 2009 2:45:15 pm by LawrenceDoliveiro
Older page: version 3 Last edited on Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:09:14 pm by JamesSpooner Revert
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
 Well, I am certainly no christian, but I do believe that "that book" got more than a few things right from an ethical point of view. The biggest of all for me, is the underlying guideline for my proposed two realms of trust described above: 
  
 ''Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.'' 
  
-Think about that. If you treat people with trust 100% of the time, you may get burned occasionally, but the effects will hopefully flow on to those you interact with, and to those that the ones you have trusted interact with, and so on, exponentially. 
+Think about that. If you treat people with trust 100% of the time, you may get burned occasionally, but the effects will hopefully flow on to those you interact with, and to those that the ones you have trusted interact with, and so on, exponentially. (Interestingly, not found stated as such in “[that book|http://groups.google.co.nz/group/nz.general/msg/4c03ca6b777a40d5]”.)  
  
 Is upping the trust quotient of the world by 0.01% worth getting burned a few times? 
 In my opinion, yes. It has to start somewhere.