Myers-Briggs type theory is a toolset for talking about personality and is based on the work of early 20th century psychologist Karl Jung.

This online Myers-Briggs test seems good as online MBTI tests go, but it's still nowhere near as comprehensive as the genuine MBTI instrument and even that claims only 85% accuracy. The individual is the best judge: if a description doesn't seem to fit, then it's probably wrong.

|^ Name |^ Type |^ E/I |^ N/S |^ T/F |^ P/J | AristotlePagaltzis | INTP |> 100 |> 56 |> 33 |> 44 | AlexandraMcGill | ISTJ |> 67 |> 22 |> 56 |> 44 | AndrewJohnson | ISTJ |> 22 |> 22 |> 56 |> 44 | BlairHarrison | INFP |> 100 |> 44 |> 44 |> 11 | ChantalThomson | ESFJ |> 78 |> 33 |> 78 |> 33 | CraigBox | ENTP |> 89 |> 44 |> 1 |> 11 | CraigBox 1? | ENTP |> 89 |> 56 |> 1 |> 22 | CraigMckenna | INTP |> 100 |> 67 |> 1 |> 11 | DanielLawson | ENFJ |> 44 |> 39 |> 11 |> 1 | DavidHallett | ENTJ |> 89 |> 44 |> 11 |> 33 | DavidMiller | INFJ |> 89 |> 89 |> 78 |> 44 | DrewBroadley | ENTP |> 11 |> 56 |> 1 |> 11 | GianPerrone | INTJ |> 22 |> 56 |> 44 |> 1 | GreigMcGill | INTJ |> 44 |> 22 |> 22 |> 11 | JamesSpooner | ENTP |> 33 |> 78 |> 67 |> 33 | JamesSpooner 1? | ENTP |> 33 |> 78 |> 78 |> 44 | JohnMcPherson 1? | ENTJ |> 1 |> 56 |> 67 |> 89 | MattBrown | ENTJ |> 61 |> 33 |> 56 |> 78 | MichaelBordignon? | ESTJ |> 11 |> 56 |> 33 |> 33 | OrionEdwards | INTP |> 11 |> 67 |> 33 |> 11 | PerryLorier | INTP |> 100 |> 33 |> 50 |> 22 | RaymondBurgess | ENTP |> 67 |> 56 |> 11 |> 11 | SamJansen | ENTJ |> 11 |> 56 |> 44 |> 44 | StuartYeates | INFP |> 33 |> 78 |> 11 |> 100

We're eventually going to graph this using a Gray Code single bit inversion, or something similar.

1? (re)performed test while drunk

External MBTI related links

• Description of all 16 types (Murray State U.)
• Another descriptions site (TypeLogic?)
• Short intro to MBTI theory
• Type dynamics: preference order