Differences between version 5 and predecessor to the previous major change of MarkusMaier.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
Newer page: | version 5 | Last edited on Sunday, January 18, 2004 6:52:09 am | by MarkusMaier | Revert |
Older page: | version 4 | Last edited on Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:56:27 am | by PhilHarper | Revert |
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
I wiki, therefore I am.
+
+----
+!Personal Messages
You said ''Neither Mozilla nor OpenOffice.org use GTK+'' 00 do they just draw widgets using GTK2 themes then? OO.o isn't finished in it's GTK2'd state, but i was pretty sure that Mozilla used GTK2 on linux quite happily if desired. --PhilHarper
-Also, [Cuckoo] being a [Qt]-porting effort for OOo doesn't make much sense if it doesn't use GTK2.. --AristotlePagaltzis
+;:IMHO that's the point... ''if desired''. Mozilla can be compiled for [GTK], as it can be compiled [Qt], but it was developed using [XUL] and later ported to these toolkits. [XUL] is still the default, so most people using ]Mozilla] defintely aren't using mozilla-gtk (or qt-mozilla for that matter), so I think mentioning it on GimpToolKit gives people the wrong impression. It's not like the [Mozilla] developers deliberately chose [GTK] as their ToolKit of choice as ''It's the ToolKit of choice for most any serious application on Linux, such as Mozilla,...'' seems to imply. I mean, even tough there is gvim you wouldn't say: ''[GTK] is the ToolKit of choice for most any serious application on Linux, such as [Vim].'' would you? I may be technically correct but gives a wrong impression. --MarkusMaier
+
+
Also, [Cuckoo] being a [Qt]-porting effort for OOo doesn't make much sense if it doesn't use GTK2.
.. --AristotlePagaltzis
i don't think OOo already uses either, the two projects are working to use native widgets from each toolkit, i think there's a framework for it. --PhilHarper
+
+;:I think OpenOffice.org uses its own ToolKit (at least it used to), but I might be wrong. I'm still a newbie and was just trying to BeBold. ;-) --MarkusMaier