Differences between version 7 and predecessor to the previous major change of MakeToSCons.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 7 | Last edited on Friday, June 4, 2004 11:23:00 am | by SamJansen | Revert |
| Older page: | version 3 | Last edited on Monday, May 31, 2004 9:29:06 pm | by SamJansen | Revert |
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
!!! Should I use SCons too?
Maybe. SCons requires that whoever has to compile the software has both Python and SCons installed. If this is an acceptable requirement, then the answer is probably "yes".
-The worst thing about SCons is that it does take some time to learn. It is not hard to learn; being based on the simple but powerful programming language Python helps here, but it can be hard to make the leap from a system you already know to a new one, even if the old system is inferior, simply because of the extra time it takes to learn the new system. However, I (SamJansen) recommend learning modern build systems that don't emply
make.
+The worst thing about SCons is that it does take some time to learn. It is not hard to learn; being based on the simple but powerful programming language Python helps here, but it can be hard to make the leap from a system you already know to a new one, even if the old system is inferior, simply because of the extra time it takes to learn the new system. However, I (SamJansen) recommend learning modern build systems that don't employ
make.
!!! The simple stuff
SCons does a few things for free. Dependency tracking is the first one that springs to mind. Consider the following makefile and its SCons equivalent:
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
Both of these work the same at the first glance, though I believe the SConstruct (yes, SConstruct is the name of the file that replaces your Makefile) file a lot more readable. However the SCons file has the following extra features:
* Proper dependency tracking. SCons scans the source file for headers so it knows when each file needs to be compiled. Make has no knowledge of this by default, and doing proper dependency tracking in make is quite a nightmare (but possible).
* MD5Sum based checking of the source files to see which ones need to be recompiled. Make uses timestamps, which is also an option for SCons.
-* No explicit rules needed for this simple example. In the makefile the linking line was still necessary (along with the strange syntax: a casual reader has no idea what $@ and $^ mean).
+* No explicit rules needed for this simple example. In the makefile the linking line was still necessary (along with the strange syntax: a casual reader has no idea what $@ and $^ mean). ''Note, the linking line isn't needed in a Makefile, if there is a dependancy with the same base name as the target, eg foo: foo.o bar.o will automatically link for you. Make has a lot of implicit rules, it pays to read about them -- Daniel Lawson''
* You can automatically clean the build with __scons -c__. This cleans only the files generated in the build. Clean rules have to be specified by the programmer in makefiles.
* Even works in Windows with the MicrosoftVisualStudio C Compiler.
!! Setting CFLAGS and similar
