Penguin
Diff: LegislatingAgainstSpam
EditPageHistoryDiffInfoLikePages

Differences between version 13 and predecessor to the previous major change of LegislatingAgainstSpam.

Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History

Newer page: version 13 Last edited on Friday, May 28, 2004 8:36:08 am by DanielLawson Revert
Older page: version 12 Last edited on Friday, May 28, 2004 5:00:33 am by AristotlePagaltzis Revert
@@ -116,8 +116,10 @@
  
 zcat(1): seconded. 
  
 SamJansen: I believe it should be a criminal offense. The penalty should range from a fine (perhaps thousands of dollars) to a short-term prison sentence; in the order of a few months. 
+  
+DanielLawson: apropos of both of the above points: http://slate.msn.com/id/2101297/ and http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/20/italy_p2p_law/. The former is tongue in cheek (as were Perry and zcat's comments I believe). The latter is current law in place in Italy, and I think is on the right track  
  
 MatthiasDallmeier: A ban from connecting to the Internet. 
  
 21. Should contraventions give rise to criminal or civil penalties?