* All other rights resulting from intellectual activity in the industrial, scientific, literary or artistic fields. 

  

 IntellectualProperty rights (IPRs) provide creators and innovators with the exclusive right, for a limited time, to control what others may do with their work. This exclusive right is justified on the grounds that IPRs give creators and innovators an opportunity to make a return on their investment in creativity or innovation, and provide an incentive for creative or innovative activity that might not otherwise take place. The benefits of this additional creativity and innovation are considered to outweigh the costs imposed on society by IPRs. 

  

  

 OpenSource licenses such as the [GPL] rely on [IntellectualProperty] law such as CopyRight to be effective. However the [FSF] (Creators of the [GPL]) [dislike the term IntellectualProperty| http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty] as it is too broad and carries many negative connotations in todays world. They suggest competely forgetting that you ever heard the words IntellectualProperty and instead focus on the individual aspects of law such as CopyRight, [Patent]s, etc.