Differences between version 9 and predecessor to the previous major change of GimpVersusPhotoshop.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 9 | Last edited on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 4:36:16 am | by JuliusThyssen | Revert |
| Older page: | version 8 | Last edited on Saturday, March 4, 2006 3:47:01 pm | by MattBrown | Revert |
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
* Supports 24-bit w/ Alpha channel [PNG]s properly, PhotoShop had some issues with these prior to version 7. (We're at Photoshop CS2 now, no problems anymore. --!JuliusThyssen)
* Supports [MNG]s, basically an animated [GIF] but using the [PNG] format for it's frames. You can do some cool stuff with the Alpha channel in [MNG]s
* It has a far more elegant UI, Photoshop's antiquated MDI dseign is simply a waste of space, it's much better on the mac, but it sucks severely on win32. (That's wlug biased opinion, many disagree wholeheartedly with that. --!JuliusThyssen)
* Good Path support(well, it works for me) including export to SVG (and what is making that superior to Photoshop exactly? --!JuliusThyssen)
-* Font Rendering with FreeType looks much better to me.
+* Font Rendering with FreeType looks much better to me. (to whom? If you want users to identify themselves when commenting here, do it yourself first!)
* if something in [TheGIMP] is causing you trouble then fix it, if you aren't capable of doing so, file a [bug report|http://bugzilla.gimp.org/] (so how is that superior to Photoshop for the task at hand; Suddenly DTP-people, image-editors and plain photo-enthusiasts need to be programmers? --!JuliusThyssen)
(Remove the above as Photoshop gets better)
