Penguin
Diff: GimpVersusPhotoshop
EditPageHistoryDiffInfoLikePages

Differences between version 5 and revision by previous author of GimpVersusPhotoshop.

Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History

Newer page: version 5 Last edited on Thursday, November 4, 2004 8:49:56 pm by CraigBox Revert
Older page: version 4 Last edited on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:19:26 pm by AristotlePagaltzis Revert
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
 * Very good path support 
 * Adjustable color reproduction 
 * Better support for tablets like Wacom, or Aiptek (__very__ important for artists) - This is a little platform dependant 
 * PDF import/export support, this is important as lots only accept/prefer material in PDF format. PhotoShop also gets the reproduction right. (Gimp 1.2 can import PDFs, although only as a bitmap - you can't edit the text. Gimp 1.2 can't save as PDF, although it can as Postscript which can easily be turned into PDF) 
-* Integrates with AdobeIllustrator (scaleable vector graphics, useful!) 
+* Integrates with [Adobe] Illustrator (scaleable vector graphics, useful!) 
 * Better filter (and 3rd party filter) support 
 * Way better text support (although, [TheGIMP] is slowly getting better at this) 
 * Processing speed 
 * Much better optimized [GIF] output support, much smaller file sizes and color reproduction at small palette sizes.