Differences between version 3 and predecessor to the previous major change of EyeCandy.
Other diffs: Previous Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 3 | Last edited on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:29:46 pm | by JohnMcPherson | Revert |
| Older page: | version 1 | Last edited on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:04:13 pm | by CraigMckenna | Revert |
@@ -1 +1,5 @@
-Stuff thats
sole purpose is to be pleasing to the eye
+Stuff whose
sole purpose is to be pleasing to the eye. More than just "good looking"; adding EyeCandy requires extra effort that does not add to functionality.
+
+For example, even a basic WindowManager can look nice, but that doesn't qualify as EyeCandy. Things that to are, for example, titlebar transparency support or extra animations.
+
+Sort of like the blonde girls you see on TV in the pits at motorsport events?
