Differences between current version and previous revision of EyeCandy.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 4 | Last edited on Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:47:12 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | |
| Older page: | version 3 | Last edited on Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:29:46 pm | by JohnMcPherson | Revert |
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
Stuff whose sole purpose is to be pleasing to the eye. More than just "good looking"; adding EyeCandy requires extra effort that does not add to functionality.
-For example, even a basic WindowManager can look nice, but that doesn't qualify as EyeCandy. Things that to
are, for example, titlebar transparency support or extra animations.
+For example, even a basic WindowManager can look nice, but that doesn't qualify as EyeCandy. Things that do
are, for example, titlebar transparency support or extra animations.
-Sort of like the blonde girls you see on TV in the pits at motorsport events?
+----
+
+
Sort of like the blonde girls you see on TV in the pits at motorsport events? --JohnMcPherson
+
+In the sense that they're just there to be sexy, yes. :) --AristotlePagaltzis
