Differences between version 3 and previous revision of Dongle.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 3 | Last edited on Tuesday, November 2, 2004 4:50:46 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
| Older page: | version 2 | Last edited on Sunday, April 18, 2004 4:54:25 am | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-A small piece of custom [Hardware] attachable to a computer to perform a narrowly defined task. [Dongle]s do not contain general-purpose [CPU], memory or [IO
] facilities.
+A small piece of custom [Hardware] attachable to a computer to perform a narrowly defined task. [Dongle]s do not contain general-purpose [CPU], memory or [I/O
] facilities.
In the 1980s and 1990s the term described [RS232] or [LPT] attached appliances acting as CopyProtection for high-end applications. [Dongle]s in this capacity acquired the image of being unwanted liabilities, not only because of their purpose, but also because of a whole slew of technical problems. They either took up a precious port or caused problems with other devices connected thru them. It was usually impossible to daisychain [Dongle]s, should several applications require them. As if all that was not enough, their connectors would often start failing within short time if un/plugged too often. As a result, these days CopyProtection [Dongle]s are a rare sight.
-The term however is being recycled as for [USB] attached, highly specialized devices, often containing [
RandomNumberGenerator]
s, secure key stores in cryptographic systems, or suchlike.
+The term however is being recycled as for [USB] attached, highly specialized devices, often containing RandomNumberGenerator~
s, secure key stores in cryptographic systems, or suchlike.
----
CategoryHardware
