Differences between version 3 and previous revision of DeadlyEmbrace.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 3 | Last edited on Monday, October 27, 2003 12:48:02 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
| Older page: | version 2 | Last edited on Monday, October 27, 2003 11:45:51 am | by StuartYeates | Revert |
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
-This is a special case of a DeadLock: two processes both wait for the other to continue. It is relatively easy to produce such a condition f.ex by writing a
piping together a program that alternates between writing a line its output and reading one from input with one that expects all input in a single batch and produces all output in a single batch.
-
-See
[Synchronisation]
+This is a special case of a DeadLock: two processes both wait for the other to continue. It is relatively easy to produce such a condition f.ex by piping together a program that alternates between writing a line its output and reading one from input with one that expects all input in a single batch and produces all output in a single batch. Proper
[Synchronisation] is necessary to avoid a DeadlyEmbrace.
