Differences between version 4 and revision by previous author of AdobePhotoshop.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Revision, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 4 | Last edited on Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:35:44 pm | by AlastairPorter | Revert |
| Older page: | version 3 | Last edited on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:12:08 pm | by AristotlePagaltzis | Revert |
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
A powerful image editor by [Adobe], currently up to version 7. It runs on MicrosoftWindows and [MacOS].
-Most additions since version 5 have been 'enhancements' not really worth the version increases; it should be around 5.5 instead of 7. One of version 7's strongpoints is it actually works on [Windows] XP and [MacOSX]. There is also a 64 bit version floating around - the only program that should need more than 4GB of [RAM] (according to Bill Gates ''source?''
).
+Most additions since version 5 have been 'enhancements' not really worth the version increases; it should be around 5.5 instead of 7. One of version 7's strongpoints is it actually works on [Windows] XP and [MacOSX]. There is also a 64 bit version floating around - the only program that should need more than 4GB of [RAM] ([
according to Bill Gates|http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/33397.html] -- about 2/3 down
).
''Well that and video editing software.'' --AristotlePagaltzis
Recently, [Adobe] made a cut down, wizard driven flavour called Photoshop Elements (now at version 2) aimed at the consumer market of digital camera owners that would get lost in the plethora of menus that Photoshop offers. As a result of reduced functionality, it is also alot cheaper ($200 as oposed to $2000 in NZ) without missing out on much that home user would need.
You can instead flash your student ID card and get a copy of the real thing for under $1000.
There seems to be a big dichotomy between users of Photoshop and [GIMP], each group complaining that the other's app sucks. See GimpVersusPhotoshop.
