Differences between version 2 and previous revision of 3ComDualLinkPPPoE.
Other diffs: Previous Major Revision, Previous Author, or view the Annotated Edit History
| Newer page: | version 2 | Last edited on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:48:41 pm | by JamesSpooner | Revert |
| Older page: | version 1 | Last edited on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:37:04 pm | by JamesSpooner | Revert |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-When 3Com decided to build a PPPoE <-> ADSL modem, they decided that conforming to the PPPoE [ RFC | http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2516.html ] was entirely too plain. Instead of using boring ASSIGNED values for the [PPPoE] session and discovery protocols, they decided ones starting with 0x3c would be much more customer orientated! So, instead of 0x8863 and 0x8864 for Discovery and Session packets respectively, they decided to use 0x3c12 and 0x3c13... insanity!
+When 3Com decided to build a PPPoE <-> ADSL modem - [3ComDualLink]
, they decided that conforming to the PPPoE [ RFC | http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2516.html ] was entirely too plain. Instead of using boring ASSIGNED values for the [PPPoE] session and discovery protocols, they decided ones starting with 0x3c would be much more customer orientated! So, instead of 0x8863 and 0x8864 for Discovery and Session packets respectively, they decided to use 0x3c12 and 0x3c13... insanity!
!User Mode
----
